22-11-2007

 

Submission from Sean Dublin Bay Loftus to Dublin City Council.

                                                             

 The CDM Consultant’s study “A vision for Dublin bay” is most welcome.  Hopefully, it’s main provisions will be accepted, particularly Option 7.  Its main point being that Dublin Port be relocated, except for its ferry and cruise line trade.  The study says that the relocation of port traffic offers a unique opportunity to both enhance and protect the recreational, amenity and environmental areas around the bay.  This is something with which I strongly agree.

Enda Connellan, CEO of Dublin Port Company says that the port is working at full capacity and that it needs to reclaim 52 acres of the inner Dublin bay.  This is politically unacceptable. Furthermore, Dublin Bay Watch has proved that the 52 acre reclamation is not necessary!.

  Bremore is a deep water facility 3 km north of Balbriggan which is being developed by the Drogheda Port Company, with capital from Treasury Holdings. The Dublin Port Company and the Drogheda Port Company are both owned by the State.  The government should direct the Dublin Port Company to enter into a joint partnership with the Drogheda Port Company, and to use the money earmarked for the Clontarf reclamation for the development of Bremore.  It should also state that the container traffic now using Dublin Port be routed through Bremore. 

            The decision to relocate old established ports or parts of them, is common practice.  This fact was pointed out at an international seminar on “Ports Area Redevelopment” which I attended in Amsterdam in 1989.  I submitted a report on the seminar at the Dublin City Council’s monthly meeting of June 1989.  The main point which was made at the seminar was that with the ever increasing advances in technology associated with the transport industry, and the growth of urban development around port areas, whole ports or sections of them have had to be relocated.

            For too long the Dublin Port Company has been allowed to act as if it is a law to itself.  It has continually ignored the Dublin City Development Plan.  Now it wants to bypass the ordinary planning procedures.  It has entered into direct consultations with An Bórd Pleanála and an Bórd has just announced that it has decided that the 52 acre infill is “a strategic infrastructure development”. This means that the Port Company can fast track its planning permission to reclaim 52 acres out of the inner Dublin Bay .

            A former internationally known marine scientist, John Purser Griffith, who was chief engineer of the Dublin Port Company for 14 years, warned that there must be no more reclamation in the inner Dublin bay.  He said that if any more reclamation is permitted, there would be serious periodic flooding along Clontarf Road , Ballybough, East Wall and Ringsend.  His professional advice was ignored. Piecemeal reclamation has been permitted which has led to the flooding warned about.  When flooding takes place and complaints are made, the Port Company disclaims all responsibility and says it is “an act of nature”!

            The Government should step in and remind the Dublin Bay stakeholders, Dublin Port Company in particular, and an Bórd Pleanála, that the National Development Plan 2007-2013 proposes a comprehensive study of the role of Dublin Port, taking account of local considerations, in the context of overall ports policy on the island of Ireland, urban development policy, the National Spatial Strategy and the National Economic Policy and this study will take account of the findings of the Dublin City Council’s Consultants study.

 Yours sincerely,

Seán Dublin Bay Loftus.

 

Seán Dublin Bay Rockall Loftus, B .L.
Nephin,
5 Seafield Avenue , Clontarf, Dublin 3.  

01 8332134/ 0868511830

Ireland ’s first environmental politician”

                                                                                    30-11-2007 .

 

Mr. John O’Connor,

Chairperson, An Bórd Pleanála,

64 Marlborough Street ,

Dublin 1.

Dear Mr. O’Connor,

I was shocked and surprised to receive the letter from Nichola Meehan, Executive Officer, informing me that an Bórd Pleanála had decided that the Dublin Port Company’s proposed development-to reclaim 21 hectares of the inner Dublin bay- would be a strategic infrastructure within the meaning of section 37A of the Act-“The Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act 2006”.

I understand that an Bórd evaluated the Dublin Port Company’s proposal without first considering the thousands of objections to this proposal, going back to 1988.  When I became aware, from news items in the Times and Independent, that the Port Company was applying to have their application so considered, I wrote two letters to you pointing out that the Port Company is acting against the public interest in proceeding with this matter before the Dublin City Council’s consultant’s in-depth  study “ Dublin Bay-an Integrated Economic and Social Vision for Sustainable Development”, had been evaluated. Today is the last date for the public’s response to this study. 

Furthermore, I pointed out that the present members of an Bórd would not necessarily be familiar with the history of the Port Company’s various proposals over the last 35 years. These include

 A proposal in 1972, to infill 2,750 acres of the bay, an area stretching from Clontarf to Merrion Strand.

Support “in principle” for the building of an oil refinery in the bay, despite the fact that an official Foras Forbartha report “On the Location of Oil Refineries in Ireland ” said that Dublin was unacceptable on economic and environmental grounds for an oil refinery. Their support “in principle” led to a 16 day Oral Planning Appeal.  At this hearing evidence was given which showed that much of what was claimed in the application was untrue.

Support for the building of huge underground caverns under the inner Dublin bay for the storage of Liquid Petroleum Gas. Clontarf Residents Association prevented this.

 reapplied in 1999 and their Environmental Impact Statement was found to be seriously flawed. They applied again in 2002 and basically, this is what we are dealing with at the moment.

The Port Company acts as a law unto itself. It ignores the City Council’s development plans.  On August 7th 2007 , Mr. Finian McGrath, T.D. received a letter from Mr. Noel Dempsey, T.D., Minister for Transport, in which he states

“ The National Development Plan 2007-2013 proposes a comprehensive study of the role of Dublin Port , taking account of locational considerations, in the context of overall ports policy on the island of Ireland , wider transport policy, urban development policy, the National Spatial Strategy and national economic policy.

This study will take account of the findings of the City Council study.  The terms of reference of the proposed study under the NDP will be finalised in the light of the outcome of the City Council’s study.”

I call on you to tell the Port Company that in the circumstances which I have just outlined, that An Bórd Pleanála will not be in a position to consider a planning application from the Port Company until the Government has done a comprehensive study of the role of Dublin Port as outlined in the letter of the Minister of Transport to Finian McGrath, T.D. in August 2007.

Yours sincerely,

Seán Dublin Bay Loftus, B.L.